Showing posts with label replacement water filter cartridges. Show all posts
Showing posts with label replacement water filter cartridges. Show all posts

Mr. Coffee 12 Cup Replacement Decanters Save 20% Off

Mr. Coffee 12-Cup Carafe - BlackThe original carafe on my Mr. Coffee coffeemaker dribbled. When it broke, I looked for a new carafe on Amazon. Reading the reviews, it seems there''s some discrepancy as to whether replacement carafes have been redesigned so they don''t dribble. Since I needed it immediately, I purchased it at Bed Bath & Beyond. It did NOT dribble, so I tried to find out exactly how to identify a good one from a bad one.

I''m publishing this on the PLD12-1 model because it''s the most likely to be viewed. I''m rating it in the middle because this is information about both models.

On AMAZON, I found two models of Mr. Coffee 12-cup replacement carafes. (I am only looking at the item in black.)

PLD12-1 ($11.46 + super saver shipping) ASIN B000BH96DO (This one.)

PLD12-2 ($20.07 + free shipping, other merchant) ASIN B0006HLJEI Mr. Coffee PLD12-2 MR. COFFEE 12-Cup Replacement Decanter

BED, BATH, & BEYOND The box was only labeled PLD12 (without a suffix). UPC: 0 72179 22692 5 $14.99

WALMART -same box, same UPC as BB&B $11.46

MR. COFFEE WEBSITE sells only PLD12-2 (or PLD13-2 in white) $15.99 + shipping

I called the toll free number 800-MR-COFFEE (800-672-6333) printed on the box. The sales rep said the PLD12-2 was the newer model, but denied that it was a redesign or that there was any problem with the older one. He also could not (or would not) tell me whether the UPC on the Bed Bath & Beyond box would indicate which model it was.

IN CONCLUSION:

1. I can''t definitively prove the PLD12-1 is a bad design.

2. The manufacturer is pushing the later model PLD12-2 without admitting guilt.

3. Walmart is the cheapest place to get one that works.

** UPDATE August 9, 2011 **

I found a website with a 2005 list showing PLD12-1 with UPC 0 72179 22692 5 (older product, but with current UPC).

This shoots down the theory that there is a correlation between the UPC on the box and the model of the carafe inside. It looks like the boxes were never updated and getting a good carafe may be just a matter of purchasing from a retailer that has newer stock.

Great coffee is made with this machine, and the value is great also. The carafe that comes with the unit sucks. When you go to pour coffee you will find that it dripples all over your counter. The carafe needs a longer pouring spout.

Buy Mr. Coffee 12 Cup Replacement Decanters Now

My Mr. Coffee coffeemaker is sturdy, works well, and makes fine coffee.

But the 12-cup decanter proved overly fragile. I broke it swabbing the inside with a dish brush.

I''d be glad to pay more for a decanter with thicker, sturdier glass.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

One other criticism: The spout on the decanter is too short, which increases the likelihood of spills.

Read Best Reviews of Mr. Coffee 12 Cup Replacement Decanters Here

I can not believe that a company as large as Mr. Coffee can sell such junk. Impossible to pour a cup without spilling. A Bunn carafe will pour many cups while this one dribbles all over the counter. Specifically, this is the original carafe that came with the coffee maker in black.

Want Mr. Coffee 12 Cup Replacement Decanters Discount?

I was ready to trash my Mr. Coffee machine because the original carafe dribbled onto the counter each time it poured. When the carafe broke in the dishwasher, I ordered the replacement because it was a lot cheaper than a whole new machine of a different brand. I was pleasantly surprised to find that they had redesigned the spout on the replacement so that it does not dribble. It still feels like it could break easily in the dishwasher, so I clean it by hand now.

Save 20% Off

Winix WAC9500 Ultimate Pet True HEPA Air Cleaner Save 23% Off

Winix WAC9500 Ultimate Pet True HEPA Air Cleaner with PlasmaWave TechnologyOver the past several years, I have been on a search to find the best reasonably priced bedroom air purifier one that works but doesn''t cost a small fortune. I will give you the basics on my experience with the Winix WAC9500 and then you can see how I rank it against other purifiers I have tried. I have tried the Winix WAC9500 for only one week before writing this review, however I will update this review as my experience with the purifier proceeds.

A little background about the environment where the purifiers were used:

I have had a little more than 4-years of experience with four other purifiers besides the Winix WAC9500, all shown below. All of them were used in a medium-sized bedroom in a dusty environment. Except for the Whirlpool, which I used for 3 years in a downtown city-environment with a busy street outside my window, all of the others were used in dry, dusty, desert-environments with the grand title of having nearly the worst air in the country. Plus there is a cat living in the house (mostly the bedroom where the purifiers have been located). If a purifier can control my allergies (sneezing, very watery eyes, sometimes a sore throat) from the bad air and eliminate any odors made by the cat, I know it is working.

Winix WAC9500

*My overall grade: A

*Replacement filters: $$$

*Replacement needed: Annually

*Overall annual cost of filters: $$ (Update April 14, 2012: We got 322 days [46 weeks] of use before the change filter light came on. Based on the current replacement cost on Amazon.com of $98.00, the daily filter cost comes to around $0.30/day.)

*Effectiveness: A

*Deal breaker: Includes a remote, which is a really nice feature. The most effective, quietest, and cost-effective purifier I have found. Consumes only 15 watts on high. Filter and Plasmawave feature are very effective at cleaning the air and neutralizing odors.

*******************************************************************************************

The Winix WAC9500 purifier is superior to almost any other air purifier I have tried. The closest comparison I can find is to the Surround Air XJ-3800 Intelli-Pro Air Purifier. Both of them have pretty good odor control, however I think I found that the Winix WAC9500 has superior odor and dust DETECTION. While both do pretty much the same with the odors once they are detected, the Winix WAC9500 was better at detecting odors and kicking up the fan speed in "auto mode" to eliminate them. I think I have found that the Winix may have the slight upper hand at eliminating the odors more quickly, but this advantage may come from the better and faster odor detection.

As for noise, I think the Winix is slightly better than the Surround Air XJ-3800. The "high" setting on the Winix, which is less powerful than the "turbo" mode available, is quieter than the highest setting on the Surround Air XJ-3800, yet it seems just as effective at cleaning the air. The Winix WAC9500 has better fan settings. For me, there is barely a noticeable difference between the "low" and "medium" settings.

One area where both the Winix and Surround Air purifiers lack is in the "auto" mode. In "auto" mode, the purifier detects dust and odors and adjusts the purifier to handle the smell or "contaminated" air. But there is inherently a defect in the way that this is designed. The purifiers automatically move to the lowest setting once the air cleaned. This by design reduces the amount of air that is moved. This affects how quickly the purifier can draw new "contaminated" air to determine that it needs to kick up the fan speed to handle the new "contaminated" air and clean. The result is dirty air in one part of the room until the purifier can draw enough of it over to the purifier to detect that it needs to increase fan speed. It takes a long time if the purifier moved to the "low" setting in "auto" mode. It would be a much better if they allowed you to set "auto" mode to the "medium" speed and it would kick up a notch or two when it senses dirty air. Because this is not possible, I have found that we tend to keep the purifiers on high, except for nights when peace and quiet is desired. Set this way, the purifiers are most effective at cleaning the air, but they consume more energy than the "auto" mode it''s a trade off.

The energy efficiency of the Winix WAC9500 signficantly outperforms the Surround Air XJ-3800. The high setting on the Winix (which I believe is as efficient as the high setting on the Surround Air) uses only 15.5 watts versus 45 watts. These numbers came from a Belkin Conserve Insight F7C005q Energy-Use Monitor:

Setting/ Winix WAC 9500 / Surround Air XJ3800

Low/ 6 watts / 31 watts

Medium/ 10 watts / 35 watts

High/ 15.5 watts / 45 watts

Turbo/ 64.5 watts / 55 watts

Pretty amazing that the high on the Winix WAC9500 only draws slightly more than a 60-watt equivalent CFL.

If you consider that the WAC9500 uses ~15 watts on high, at $0.106/kwh, the cost to operate this purifier 24-hours a day is $13 for a year. Over 5 years (assuming that is an average lifespan for an air purifiers), the cost to operate on the high setting (which is not the highest) 24-hours a day is $65. However, if you look closely, many purifiers in this class use a minimum of 35-watts, some as much as 112 watts in turbo modes (like the Electrolux Oxygen Ultra Air Cleaner, EL500AZ). Over 5-years at 35-watts for 24-hours a day, that is $153, assuming the same electricity cost above. The difference between 15-watts and 35-watts over 5-years is $88.

There is an "auto sleep" feature on the Winix WAC9500 that I was never able to get to work correctly. Once activated, it is supposed to set the purifier on low mode when the room is dark and return to the previous settings once the room gets light again. However, every time I activated the "auto sleep" function, the purifier just went to the lowest setting regardless of how much light was in the room (I removed all of the plastic films from the front of the purifier). I think it may need a better light sensor for it to work as designed.

The shipping information on Amazon indicates that the purifier is over 50 lbs., however, the actual weight of the purifier is more like 20 lbs.

*******************************************************************************************

Other notes about purifiers in the same category I have tried before the Winix WAC9500:

The first purifier I tried five years ago was this model based upon a Consumer Reports top pick:

Whirlpool AP45030K Whispure Air Purifier, HEPA Air Cleaner (used for 3 years)

*My overall grade: C

*Replacement filters: $$$ (you have to buy HEPA and pre-filters separate)

*Replacement needed: pre-filters every 3-4 months, HEPA every year

*Overall annual cost of filters: $$

*Effectiveness: C

*Deal breaker: No means to eliminate odors, while the Winix WAC9500 and Surround Air XJ-3800 have electronic odor control (which really work), and the filters became stale before the annual filter change. Required frequent vacuuming of the pre-filter. A lot of unsightly dust would accumulate on the grille, which the Winix WAC9500 and Surround Air XJ-3800 do not have.

Two Hunter 30067 Hepatech Air Purifier for Medium-Size Rooms (placed on opposite sides of the room) (used for 6 months)

*My overall grade: D

*Replacement filters: $$ (you have to buy HEPA and pre-filters separate)

*Replacement filters are cheap and thin.

*Replacement needed: after 3-4 months

I found that even though these purifiers have a pre-filter, the HEPA filter was filthy and the indicator indicated that they needed replacement after only 3 months of use. (This model does not have an automatic dirty-filter alert. You have to look to see how dark the filter is and compare it to a strip on the filter.)

*Overall annual cost of filters: $$$

*Effectiveness: C

*Deal breaker: Noisy because we had to run them on high to be effective. Medium-speed was better as far as noise, but not effective at cleaning the dust. One of the two started to make a terribly annoying whirling-sound not even 3 months after starting to use it. We had to keep that purifier on low. These purifiers also have no means to remove odors. Required frequent vacuuming of the pre-filter. Having to replace the HEPA filter and pre-filters every 3-months was excessive and costly. Dust would also accumulate on the front grille. Rather than deal with the warranty for the defective purifier, we changed to the 3M below (for worse).

3M Ultra Clean Bedroom Air Purifier FAP02-RC (used for 2 months)

*My overall grade: F

*Replacement filters: $$$ (only one filter to change; contains no other filters)

Replacement filters are cheap and thin.

*Replacement needed: after 3 months

Since there is no pre-filter, this purifier requires more frequent replacement of the HEPA.

*Overall annual cost of filters: $$$

Notes: The replacement filters were nearly impossible to find. I bought this purifier because others said they could find the filters at Target, but I couldn''t. On Amazon, the filters are only available through third-party sellers. No effective means of odor elimination like the Winix WAC9500 or Surround Air XJ-3800. One single thin filter and that''s it.

*Effectiveness: D

*Deal breaker: The single-filter design is so antiquated. The fact that dust, which would normally get trapped by a pre-filter ends up in the main HEPA filter, decreases the life of the HEPA significantly. Don''t waste your time with this purifier...you''ll just be purchasing countless filters.

Surround Air XJ-3800 Intelli-Pro Air Purifierr (used for 6 months)

*My overall grade: C(Initially B when writing this review, but downgraded to C-. See last update at bottom of review.)

*Replacement filters: $ (you only have to buy one filter the HEPA; all others are washable)

*Replacement needed: after one year

*Overall annual cost of filters: $

Notes: The lights on the front of the unit are terribly bright at night, unlike the Winix WAC9500, which dims in "sleep" mode. We ended up putting black electrical tape over the lights.

*Effectiveness: B

*Deal breaker: No remote. We continued to sneeze despite running this purifier 24-7 and cleaning the unit far more regularly than recommended. The cleanings can be time consuming but the overall annual cost is the lowest because it only requires the replacement of one reasonably priced HEPA filter.

After all of these air purifiers, the winner for me is the...Winix WAC9500. Even though it is not perfect, it is the best I have come across so far. The light sensor may not work correctly and the "auto" feature may lack, but I found that it is better than all of the other alternatives I have tried. It is quiet, the filters only have to be swapped annually and it''s energy-star rated consuming only 15 watts on high. I would recommend this purifier.

Update August 27, 2011:

Everyday we are impressed more and more by this air purifier. It has honestly exceeded any expectations I had. And it still outperforms any air purifier we have tired before. The only maintenance we''ve had to perform is to vacuum the pre-filter occasionally. This purifier does miracles cleaning up after our smelly cat. And on days when the air quality has been in the unhealthy range, it has made such a difference in the room where its located. I still can''t recommend this enough.

Update April 14, 2012:

Just two days ago, our change filter light came on. Based on my calculations, the filter lasted us 46 weeks. This has pleasantly surprised us and we have not noticed an negligible difference in air quality over the life the filter. We regularly vacuum the filters, however, we have never washed them even though I know it''s possible to wash the carbon filter. When I last checked, Amazon.com is selling the replacement filter set for around $98, which makes the filter cost a little over $2 per week, or $0.30 per day.

Update November 28, 2012:

This purifier is still going strong. In fact, I am on here to buy another for the bedroom. I''ve been shopping around to see if there is any new, good competition, but I am going to stick with this one because it has been such a reliable workhorse over the past 18-months. The Surround Air XJ-3800 we have in the bedroom just doesn''t cut it any more. I have noticed an improvement when I have moved the Winix WAC9500 into the bedroom. The Surround Air CJ-3800 doesn''t do anything with the dust or cat hair. It''s hard to believe the mess that accumulates in a week. In fact, I would downgrade the Surround Air XJ-3800 to Cif I were to write my review again today. It is not awful, but it is not nearly as effective as this Winix WAC9500, at twice the cost to operate. The Winix WAC9500 been such a pleasure to have. It might be overkill in size for the bedroom (175 square feet), but it will be perfect on the medium setting.

Update December 17, 2012:

I ordered a second unit a while ago and it''s been running about for a little more than two weeks now. The second unit definitely has a slight sound when the Plasmawave feature is engaged. I now know what the other reviewers have mentioned. The original unit makes a much less noticeable sound. Now, since I have two units to compare, I notice a very, very slight sound too from the first (quieter) unit when I turn the Plasmawave off and on. The sound of the new unit is very slight and since it is not in the bedroom, it is not bothersome. I now have the quieter original unit in the bedroom.

Out of curiosity I called and asked the manufacturer in Chicago what they thought. They told me the sound is normal, but they did not have an answer why one unit would be louder than the other. They informed me that the sound is partly determined by the quality of the air. I do not believe that has been my experience. The second unit has been consistent in the sound that it produces, whether the air is clean or contaminated. I am sensitive to noises so I think the sound would bother me if the louder unit was in the bedroom and I was trying to sleep. However, we barely notice it in the living room. It seems the noise does not affect the performance of the units. They are both equally good with cleaning the air. If you are sensitive to noise (and I mean it is very, very slight), you might not want the Plasmawave feature on when you are trying to sleep. The feature can be turned on and off using the remote control (only).

Update January 28, 2013:

Now both units are quiet. Something changed with the newer unit that we received, but I am not sure what. Whatever happened has caused the noisier unit to quiet down. Maybe it just needed a "breaking-in" period? We love these purifiers. They are about as "green", earth-friendly, as you can find while being very effective. We don''t notice any change in our electricity bill with the addition of another unit. We still get some dust, but not nearly as much. This will not magically solve all of your dust problems, but it helps tremendously.

Trying to research air cleaners is very, very time consuming. I spent a week doing it. I recommend you google "air purifier power". A second source is to google "allergy buyers club". The first source does not compete with Amazon because they do not actually sell anything. But Amazon still wanted the www address deleted. One important thing to note, if you google "air purifier reviews", please be careful. Many so called review websites are really owned by one particular company brand and they are pushing their brand over all others. But they try to disguise their web store as a place to check out reviews and ratings. Some websites do sell a variety of brands, but if you ask them for assistance, of course they are going to point you to the brands they sell and they are not going to mention other, better brands they do not sell. It was difficult finding unbiased assistance.

The Feedback of the first site ultimately led me to purchase this machine, even though they did not recommend it as the absolute best choice. They actually preferred the Rabbit BioGS and the Sharp I talk about below, in this price range. I think any of these 3 would work, but you will still benefit from reading the below points.

Most Important Things To Know Going In:

1) COST

A really good air purifier is going to be somewhere in the neighborhood of $1,000. I cannot afford that, so going in I know I am not buying the very best here, I am going for a good compromise on price and ability. Most air cleaners in the $300 range will have some flaws, so you are really looking for what you can live with. When I started searching I thought I could get a top of the line cleaner for $300. That is what you might think if you shop at Big Box stores, like me. Doing the research opened my eyes to the truth about how much an excellent air purifier really costs. This is my second air cleaner purchase. Just like most consumers, my first purchase was an air cleaner in the $50 price range. That unit was fair, but left me wanting much more and I started reading about air cleaners.

2) PLASMAWAVE, GREAT TECHNOLOGY, BUT DON''T EXPECT MIRACLES

If you want to see how Plasmawave works, go to the Winix company website, which is WINIXINC. One of the links is about the technology of Plasmawave. They have a nice informative video lasting about 4 minutes about the technology. Before watching, just be advised that they are of course overly optimistic about the capabilities of the machine. But I like the information presented. What customer reviews and professional reviews have said about plasmawave.....

A) It kills viruses and germs that it comes into contact with, but it won''t sterilize door knobs, sink handles, etc. In other words, it helps but isn''t a miracle worker.

B) It neutralizes VOCs and harmful chemicals in small, reasonable amounts. However, you cannot paint a chest of drawers and then put the Plasmawave in there and expect it to neutralize the huge volumes of chemicals in the air. In fact, one reviewer warned you might get a hydroxy radical mess as the machine tries to bond with the VOCs in the air.

C) Plasma Ion technology has had some critics who say that it''s process may dry out the air somewhat. At worst, it may make your nose stuffy if you sleep next to the machine. Everyone seems to agree the Winix is not as bad at drying the air as the Sharp. The Sharp''s positive and negative ion maker is rated as stronger than the Winix machine. I personally cannot sleep next to my Winix 9500 on the night stand, because it will make my nose dry and stuffy. Maybe just because of the circulation of the air over my face as I sleep. However, I sleep just fine if it is 6 feet away from the foot of the bed. So it is not a problem. I am actually testing it now, just for fun, using instruments that measure humidity, to see if the humidity in the room with the Winix 9500 changes at all.

The Plasmawave technology was started by Sharp in Japan. Years ago, when people said the Sharp Plasmawave dried out the air, Sharp addressed the issue by adding humidifiers to their Plasmoclaster machines. This website posed the question that if the plasmawave needs water vapor to work, does it work poorly in low humidity environments. I don''t know. The company does not list any minimum levels of humidity that I have found. Go to air purifier power website mentioned for more explanation.

D) You will see many reviewers saying they want to be able to turn off the plasmawave part of the machine at times and just use the HEPA and other filters. Winix 9500 does have the option to turn the Plasmawave off, which is nice. However, the owner''s manual suggest that you should leave it on at all times.

3) SLEEP MODE

You have to know that many people seem to have issues with the automatic sleep mode. The light sensor does not seem to work well. This goes back to my first point, you are in the price range where you cannot expect perfection. I ordered one knowing the automatic sleep mode is flawed. Most manufacturers seem to miss the point that people don''t want a huge glowing readout that is going to light up a dark room when you are trying to sleep. So, if this is important to you, make sure you purchase a brand that offers the ability to turn off lights or dim them. Most units do not offer this, especially in the less than $200 arena.

4) ANNUAL REPLACEMENT FILTER COSTS ARE WINIX $90 VS SHARP $150 VS RABBIT BIO GS AT $60, ALSO CONSIDER FUTURE AVAILABILITY OF FILTERS THAT YOU WILL NEED FOR YOUR MACHINE

These Winix units are made by a Korean company who used a very similar technology to the Sharp Plasmocaster made in Japan. I wanted the new Sharp model Plasmocaster FP-A80u which is $300. I had a hard time finding one to buy, Amazon only carries the cheaper models that don''t have an automatic mode, as of March 30,2012. The Sharp models are supposed to be better quality than the Winix, but Sharp has had issues with not stocking replacement filters. One website warned that about the time you need a replacement filter, Sharp has discontinued the model and the filters you need. This was a big concern for me, since I was having trouble finding the unit to purchase, what are the chances I can get a filter 2 yrs from now. The sharp replacement filters are supposed to cost about $50 more per year than the Winix filters, so there was an additional annual cost to the Sharp Model also.

Almost every major online seller of air cleaners carries the Winix models. So I feel like finding replacement supplies should be much easier 2 yrs down the road. But there are really no guarantees. That is why the website I mentioned recommends some brands that have a really good customer support and are located here in the USA.

5) ROUGHLY 180 SQ FT AREA IS MAX

Most websites dedicated to allergy sufferers say that any air purifier needs to change air 6 times per hour in a room, to be effective. Of course manufactures of all brands don''t like using this standard because it shrinks the amount of square footage that their particular machine can clean. Using this standard, one website who shows their math on how they figure out the air change rate per hour, adjusted the Winix 9500 to 180 sq ft max. Don''t get the idea that only Winix overstates its square footage ability, this seems to be common to all brands. Manufacturers will use 2 or 3 air changes per hour, instead of the 6 per hour that allergy specialists recommend.

6) CADR Ratings

The Ultimate Pet 9500 is AHAM certified with CADRs (Clean Air Delivery Rates) at 182 Dust, 194 Smoke, 183 Pollen. The higher the number, the better. The Sharp model advertised a Pollen CADR of over 300! The Rabbit Bio GS was very similar to the CADR numbers of the Winix.

The review website I mentioned said the CADR numbers for the Winix 9500 were slightly suspect and may be better in real life. He based this on the fact that the CADR numbers for the cheaper Winix 5300 are actually much better than the top of the line, Winix 9500. We know the Winix 9500 has a better filter system. A lot of people with the Winix 5300 buy the replacement filters for the Winix 9500 and try to use them in their machine. AHAM certified CADRs (Clean Air Delivery Rates) for the Winix 5300 are 248 Dust,235 Smoke,251 Pollen. Doesn''t seem to make sense, does it?

7) NOISE

The over all noise of the machine is very quiet, except on turbo. The low setting is so quiet that I keep turning it up to Medium or High, because I don''t feel like it is circulating enough air.

The plasmawave technology does make a little bit of noise that you may not hear at all, depending on age and high frequency hearing loss. It is a very unique sound. It reminds me of those electric pest control devices that are supposed to operate on a frequency humans cannot hear, but you can hear a little high frequency chattering sound. Again, if you don''t hear it, you probably lost that part of your hearing range. I don''t notice it unless it is sitting on the nightstand and I am trying to fall asleep.

8) SHORTEST WARRANTY IN THE $300 PRICE RANGE--ONE YEAR

The parent company is Korean. They have a short warranty period of only one year. Many units in this range offer much greater warranty periods. You kind of have to balance that with the great reviews here on Amazon. I would have liked for this unit to have a better warranty, but I bought one anyway. It wasn''t a deal breaker for me. I liked that the unit had been out a few years and had a proven track record.

A note on the Rabbit Bio GS, the original Rabbit 421a was supposed to be made in Japan. However, noticing all of the recent complaints on Amazon about quality control problems with the Rabbit Bio GS, I wonder if they have not started making this unit in another country. It seems like the overall quality has declined from the customer complaints. However, their warranty is good and their customer service is supposed to be great.

CONCLUSION: After a week of research, I don''t know that there is really a "perfect" unit in this price range. If you want to drop a $1,000, you can get a unit that seems to have little, if any, flaws.

In this price range, competition is fierce among many companies who are bringing cheaper units out of China or Korea to rebadge and rename and then sell here in the USA. If you don''t like the Winix 9500, try the Rabbit Air BioGS. Rabbit Air BioGS annual filter replacement cost is lower than these Winix units. However, they have their flaws too. You can read those in the reviews here and at other websites. Like I said, the Sharp FP A80u for $300 was supposed to be great, but I could only find it at Best Buy Online and talked myself out of it because of future availability of supplies. It was just introduced in the last few months, so it is possible that the Sharp FP A80u is not fully on the market yet. You may want to check back later. The fact that Amazon carried the cheaper, manual mode only, Sharp FP A60u, did make me worry somewhat about what happened to the A80U which adds the much needed "automatic" clean mode.

In the end, as one Review Website put it, as long as you don''t buy a cheap air cleaner that pollutes the air through one of two methods, you should see some improvement in purchasing almost any air cleaner. The 2 methods of polluting are units that CREATE ozone, which you don''t want. You will see most units claim somewhere that their unit does not do this. The second is in cheap units that let dirty air slip around the edges of the Hepa filter. This creates a problem where small molecules of dirt and bacteria can build up inside the unit itself, causing the exhausted or returned air to actually be dirty, possibly carrying bacteria, etc. That is why I chose the Winix 9500 over the cheaper Winix 5300. Most websites seem to think that having a filter cassette, while increasing cost of filter replacement, may help avoid the leaking of air around a bent or damaged air filter. Some other brands, like Orsani , have addressed this by using a magnetic gasket to hold the filter firmly in place and avoid air leaking around the filter.

I hope this review saves someone a week of valuable time, that they can then spend with the person they love. I felt like after the time I invested, I needed to write something!

ONE MONTH UPDATE

After a month with the Winix 9500, I think I could have been happy with the Sharp FP A60 U, which is manual mode only. I am not really using the fancy automatic modes of operation. I haven''t even turned off the Plasmawave. I pretty much run it in manual mode on HIGH most of the time. Just because I want it to move as much air as possible and I tend to move it around each day, to different parts of the house. On the medium and low modes, I just don''t feel like the machine is circulating enough air to help.

I like the machine, but truthfully, it is hard for me to really tell if it is helping. I just have to hope that it is. Other than getting rid of immediate odors, who knows if the negative, positive ions thing is working? I keep checking the prefilter and I don''t really see as much dust and dirt as I would have hoped. I thought it would be coated by now, but it still looks relatively clean.

If you don''t have to have the fancy automatic modes, purchase one of the cheaper models of Sharp or Winix that still allow the deluxe filters to be used in them. The reviews I had read before I purchased claimed that you really did want automatic mode. But I just haven''t used it at all, because in automatic mode the unit runs at a very low setting until it senses a need to rev up. This might be great if you have a pet and the unit kicks on when they pass close by. Just understand, it is mopping up the immediate threat in a 6-8 foot circle and then cutting back off. I want it to clean the whole room and remove all of the dust in the air. So I leave it on the high setting all day. I could have done just fine with a "Manual Mode Only" unit, as long as I was still getting the same quality filter.

Buy Winix WAC9500 Ultimate Pet True HEPA Air Cleaner Now

(2008 HOLIDAY TEAM) UPDATE: As of the end of November, 2012, it will have been 18 months since I owned this machine. The replacable HEPA filter red light finally went on for replacement. I have been using this machine daily sometimes 24 hours. That''s a long lasting filter!

In the past, I''ve used various air purifiers, mostly due to my cat''s dander and occasional odors (like burning something in the kitchen). Holmes HAP716-U True-HEPA 3-Speed Tower Allergen Remover was convenient and had a thin washable piece of foam, but expensive filter replacements. I used to actually vacuum out the filters to make them last. This Winix True HEPA Filter is an amazing machine.

The Winix cleans through five stages instead of two. Air is also pulled in from two opposing sides with 1" gaps instead of one side and shoots it straight up into the room. The air first travels through the "washable" Anti-Bacterial Pre-filter, then the True Hepa Filter, the "washable" cassette frame, then the "`washable" Nano-Silver Mesh, then the "washable" Carbon Filter before finally getting a dose of `PlasmaWave'', which generates both positive and negative ions to create plasma clusters. This neutralizes viruses, bacteria, chemical vapors and odors. Since this is the Ultimate Pet Model, it actually SUCKS CAT HAIR onto the first "washable" Pre-filter! This is what I have always been looking for.

The Display Panel is very intuitive with a timer button, a function button (low, medium, high and Turbo), Dust & Odor Sensors which actually will rise on a colored grid from green to yellow to red. One day, I burned bacon in the kitchen and the Odor Sensor went into red, even though it was in the next room!

The Change Filter Indicator lets you know when it is time to clean your "washable" filters. In Auto-Mode, the `smart sensors'' sense the amount of impurities and adjust the fan speed accordingly! The entire unit will go into `sleep mode'' when the room is dark, providing filtration without any noise and will readjust with light. There is a sensor for everything. I like the medium setting for sleeping, providing a low white noise.

This is a sturdily built HEPA filter and with washable filters, it will last and save you money. The only filter that needs to be changed is the True HEPA Filter and these run about eighty dollars, but I do not anticipate changing this often considering moderate use of three months only suggests cleaning the washable filters.

Considering I sneeze violently at least once a day, I have not had an attack since this machine has been turned on. This unit is a keeper. (I even suspect that when the True HEPA Filter needs to be cleaned I could use my vacuum, but we''ll see how long that takes). There is also a nice small remote control that works all functions and nicely sits in a tray inside the top of the unit.

Read Best Reviews of Winix WAC9500 Ultimate Pet True HEPA Air Cleaner Here

This device seems to be doing what it says it will do. Air quality in our living room is indeed better. We have two dogs and they''re mostly indoors. Their dander and hair go everywhere. I also have an open plan house where living room and kitchen are a part of one space. The 9500 does detect, and control odors, dander, and dust. After a week''s use, my wife says she noticed the difference and thinks it''s now easier to breath and the sinus issue she suffers seem to be letting up.

I also got the smaller PlasmaWave 5300 for the bedroom. While 5300 seems to be doing equally effective job in filtering the air, the build quality of 9500 is way better. But most importantly, the noise levels of 9500 is much much better. In fact, 5300 can''t really be used in a bedroom environment unless you keep it on low fan speed setting. Any faster than low, the 5300 considerably noisier both from the moving air and the fan. The 9500, however, can be used in a bedroom all the way up to high setting, where it merely produces a whooshing white noise. Low and medium speed settings, it''s hardly audible. Spend the extra money and get the 9500.

Dec 27, 2012 update:

It''s been over a year now that we had this unit, running 24/7, and we can''t be happier. I can now categorically say that it helps with allergies and overall upper respiratory issues that used to affect everyone in the family.

Want Winix WAC9500 Ultimate Pet True HEPA Air Cleaner Discount?

Among all the air cleaners I have seen, this one is truly the best. On the very first day that I had it delivered, I decided to try it out and brought a cigarette into the living-room where I placed the WINIX WAC9500 AIR CLEANER. We never allow anybody to smoke in our house but I decided to use cigarette smoke to test this product just for once. The moment this air cleaner perceived the smoke in the room, its air quality indicators started flashing orange and then red and the air cleaner went to work on eliminating the nasty odor of cigarette smoke.

Five minutes later, I asked my husband (who was unaware of the experiment I was conducting) to come downstairs. "Do you notice anything?" I asked. "Yes, the air feels unusually fresh," he responded. The WINIX air cleaner left no trace of the cigarette smoke in the air.

If you have smokers in the family or if people who smoke visit you on a regular basis, this product is a must have. It purifies the air and makes it feel almost dewy in its cleanliness.

The product description says that it is a great air cleaner to place in your bedroom. I''m not sure that this would be a good idea unless your bedroom is really huge and you will be able to place the air cleaner far away from the bed. WINIX WAC9500 AIR CLEANER is a lot quieter than any other air cleaner that I have seen. However, it isn''t completely noiseless. It does produce a certain amount of background noise as it lets the air out. For people who need complete silence to be able to sleep, this will not be an object they will enjoy having in their bedrooms.

At this point, I have used WINIX WAC9500 AIR CLEANER in different areas of our house and for different purposes. To give an example, there is some sort of a moldy spot upstairs which creates an unpleasant, stuffy smell. Until we can get people in to take care of it, I placed the air cleaner in the vicinity of the moldy spot and now this is the nicest smelling area in my house. I have also used it in the kitchen, in the study, and in the living-room. The WINIX WAC9500 AIR CLEANER is light enough to be carried downstairs and upstairs easily by a reasonably healthy person. It also looks a lot more pleasing aesthetically than most other air cleaners that often look like their only purpose is to clash with the decor.

I have been using WINIX WAC9500 AIR CLEANER for over a month now and haven''t been able to find anything I dislike about it.

Save 23% Off

Proctor-Silex 43501 Automatic Drip Coffeemaker

Proctor-Silex 43501 Automatic Drip CoffeemakerThis is our third one. It is very basic and does the job. Coffee is hot. No frills. Love it. We replace it about every two or three years. Rock steady.

We''ve been using it for about a week, and so far it works well. It''s a nice, cheap and simple coffee maker. My only minor complaint is that it doesn''t have a window on the reservoir area to monitor the progress.

Buy Proctor-Silex 43501 Automatic Drip Coffeemaker Now

It is really good as of its low price. Maybe you will think that it is a little rough, but it is enough for daily use. It is very easy to make coffee

Read Best Reviews of Proctor-Silex 43501 Automatic Drip Coffeemaker Here

The burner on my previous coffee maker had shed its coating in spots and was rusting. I bought this simple machine as a replacement. It does the job. You do have to pour water from the carafe into the reservoir very slowly to avoid spillage, and it''s nearly impossible not to have some water on the counter after filling. I''ve not had a similar problem when pouring coffee, though, so I can live with wiping up a bit of water. This item has no clock, no programming, no automatic shut off. It''s completely basic, and it does what it is designed to do. It takes basket-type filters, which are much less expensive than are the cone type. All in all, a satisfactory purchase.

Want Proctor-Silex 43501 Automatic Drip Coffeemaker Discount?

Big Berkey Water Filter-2 Black Berkey Filters and Water View Spigot

Big Berkey Water Filter-2 Black Berkey Filters and Water View Spigot
  • 2 Black Berkey purification elements- 2 hole plugs--1 water view spigot
  • 8.5" in diameter- 20" tall--7 lbs.
  • 2 gallon water storage capacity
  • Filters up to 3.5 gallons per hour
  • Recommended For up to 8 people

I have always been a water drinker but I usually drink hot water. Cold water just never seemed palpable to me; I never knew why. I think I''ve figured it out. Hot water somehow masked the mineral and chemical taste of the water. Since having my Berkey drinking water has taken on new meaning. I LOVE the taste. No need to heat my water anymore! I highly recommend getting the spigot with the glass vile attached. It takes the guess work out of how much water to add to the Berkey each night.

Buy Big Berkey Water Filter-2 Black Berkey Filters and Water View Spigot Now

I had a problem with the two Black Berkey filters. They would not filter out the red dye. I contacted them and presto they sent two replacement filters THAT DAY, they did not wait for me to send the defective filters before they sent the replacements. They even issued a call tag to pick up the bad filters at their expense. Customer service was on TOP of every communication.

The hardest part in the process is determining which Berkey Water filter outfit will work best for you. The prices from advertiser to advertiser is not that big of a difference for price evaluation. Then order from these folks, IF the price is higher here it is worth it in customer support.

Torre & Tagus Axis Stainless Steel Pitcher Save 20% Off

Torre & Tagus Axis Stainless Steel Pitcher, 46-OunceI am always looking for a lightweight pitcher. I found it! Would have like it a little bigger especially since it is so light.

The style is perfect for the younger generation

I bought this one after sending back the ''Elegance Lines 52-Ounce Stainless Steel Water Pitcher'' see my review. This one, Torre & Tagus Axis, is nicely constructed, attractive, functional. I like it.

Buy Torre & Tagus Axis Stainless Steel Pitcher Now

Purchased a few of these pitchers for friends and family (and myself, or course). They were a hit! Modern, stylish, stainless steel design and it''s practicality when hostings guests make this item a winner!

Read Best Reviews of Torre & Tagus Axis Stainless Steel Pitcher Here

beautiful lines and perfect size shipped on time . . . . . . . . . . . .

Want Torre & Tagus Axis Stainless Steel Pitcher Discount?

Aqua-Pure AP903 Water Filter System Save 44% Off

Aqua-Pure AP903 Water Filter System, Whole House Filtration
  • Non-corrosive stainless steel head is allows for "sweat in place" installation
  • Carbon filter media reduces chlorine taste and odor
  • System materials are FDA CFR-21 compliant
  • High flow rate provides 20 gallons (75.7 liters) of filtered water per minute
  • Cartridges simply twist off for replacement - no tools, no contact with filter material

As a plumber I have installed many different styles and brands of water filters. This one is very nicely built and easy to install and service. The filter head is made from Stainless Steel which will last a lifetime in normal household service. The filter element is easy to install and remove for replacement, the best part of the filter is there is no messy cartridge to replace. It is a one piece filter which keeps some water in it, but can be controlled easily without spilling it.

Additionally the filter provides great tasting water with no odors, or visible sediment of any kind. I would recommend this product to anyone looking for a whole house system that does not negatively impact water flow rates.

Buy Aqua-Pure AP903 Water Filter System Now

We were having a major issue with sediment and odor with our water, esp the sediment. We recently had to replace the hot water heater and when I went to go empty it, the sediment issue became very apparent. About a gallon of mud poured out of the heater when it was first emptied. At this point, we knew we needed a good water filter to go along with the water heater. We decided on the AP903 based on various review from here and other places on the web. The price is excellent and we were willing to give this a shot. After some pipe work was completed, we flushed the filter for about 5 mins and instantly noticed a difference in the water, esp the odor.. It was gone. completely. Also, we noticed that the water right out of the faucet was better as well. Our house has 1" main coming into the house which goes right into the filter and we have noticed just a very very slight reduction in water pressure, but nothing to be concerned about.. Overall, an excellent filter so far. Only thing left to judge is the life of the filter, other wise I would not think twice in reccommending this filter to anyone.

Vertex Pure Water Machine EasyPur EZ-575 Undersink Reverse Osmosis System

Vertex Pure Water Machine EasyPur EZ-575 Undersink Reverse Osmosis System
  • Patented Twist-off FIlter Cartridges for fast, easy replacement
  • All Push-Fit O-ring seal fittings
  • 3/8" tank to faucet for 1 GPM flow
  • Compact 5 Stage Design

Vertex water from Montclair California, makes a shoddy product that if it breaks, is virtually impossible to get customer service. There is only one guy, his name is Steve and he will give you the run around to make sure he does not give yo any service whatsoever. Buyer beware.

Buy Vertex Pure Water Machine EasyPur EZ-575 Undersink Reverse Osmosis System Now

This was one of the best investments I''ve ever made. The cleanest water. period. It''s a decently easy install even for a poozer like me who has no experience plumbing. There are also video tutorials online to help you out if you can''t follow the directions. AWESOME! BUY ONE OR DRINK CRAPPY WATER!!!

Read Best Reviews of Vertex Pure Water Machine EasyPur EZ-575 Undersink Reverse Osmosis System Here

It was easy to install. It has a larger tank, 4 gallons, so I don,t run out in the middle of filling water bottles. I have a pier & beam House & was able to put the tank under the floor so it hardly uses any cabinet space. Love it.

Austin Air HEGA (Allergy Machine) Jr Replacement Filter

Austin Air HEGA Jr Replacement Filter w/ Prefilter - SandstoneI purchased a pre-owned Health Mate Plus Jr. from eBay. The unit had the more expensive Superblend filter in it, but was about 6 years old. A rep at Austin recommended this HEGA filter for my application (cigarette smoke) versus the more expensive Superblend. I really appreciated her integrity in not just pointing me to the most expensive filter to get the $$$.

This filter/unit work great. I am very pleased with its performance.

Culligan RC-EZ-1 EZ-Change Replacement Cartridges (3000-Gallon) Save 41% Off

Culligan RC-EZ-1 EZ-Change Replacement Cartridges, 3000-Gallon
  • Twist on twist off design mechanism with quick connect fittings
  • Reduces bad taste and odor and chlorine
  • NSF Certified and a 5 year warranty
  • 3000-Gallon capacity
  • Filter change reminder sticker

I started out with the EZ-3 because it eliminated turbidity in the water; it also slows water flow significantly. So, I tried the EZ-1, and it eliminated the turbidity, too, without reducing our water flow or diminishing the taste. Plus, it''s cheaper and lasts longer.

Buy Culligan RC-EZ-1 EZ-Change Replacement Cartridges (3000-Gallon) Now

Using in our RV in an area of poor tasting city water. Replaced our first EZ-1 with an EX-3 thinking it would be better; it slowed the water flow to a trickle. Ordered another EZ-1 and the flow is back to normal... the water taste on the EZ-1 is just as good as the 3 without the flow issues. Cheaper too!

Read Best Reviews of Culligan RC-EZ-1 EZ-Change Replacement Cartridges (3000-Gallon) Here

I have been using these filters for about 7 years, very good quality and do a very good job filtering!!. I live in Venezuela, tap water is not very good quality, but this filter works really good. I''m using a sediment filter as a first stage and then this one for ice making machine and drinking water from refrigerator. Replacement is very easy, you dont need any tools or to shut down any valve, just turn the filter in the right direction, it will shut water line, replace, turn lock and done! You can use level 2 o 3 filters, but you will need to replacement them more often.

Want Culligan RC-EZ-1 EZ-Change Replacement Cartridges (3000-Gallon) Discount?

Received quickly. Filter unit was great. Included plastic installation hardware was suspect, so I purchased brass components for the installation. I also purchased a better faucet (at the same time)after reading previous customer reviews (glad I did). Under counter installation and filter replacement every 3000 gallons or so. Now I only use about 20 percent less coffee and the coffee is much much better.

Save 41% Off

Our city is known for having pretty decent water but from time to time I would notice a slightly different taste. I assume the change was from mandatory water treatments that the city provides when there is work done on the lines. since I have been using these, the water always tastes good.

CRL Water Spot Remover - Quart

CRL Water Spot Remover - Quart
  • Removes Alkaline Residue, Chemical and Mineral Deposits From Uncoated Clear and Float Surfaces

This is a fantistic product, it cleaned the cloudy windows in one operation with a minimun of effort anr use of product. I highly recommend this product and already have. Will purchase more as we need it.

Water Saver Shower Head

Water Saver Shower Head
  • shower head

It''s a classic and original design. It was sturdy, worked well, and is still in production. One might call this the first water saving shower head. It''s cheap, effective, and comfortable. Details below.

My family bought this showerhead before I was born. It lasted what I''m estimating is over two decades before the washer wore out and it started leaking at the pivot point. This was no big deal for the first few years but we replaced it with another of the same model eventually. We have extremely hard water (so hard that our pipes block with crystals) and the holes the water pours through get clogged, causing the water beads to get smaller. At that time I clean this showerhead with a needle and some vinegar and it''s as good as new for another two years. Takes me 2 minutes. If you live in an area with average water this should last many years without buildup and many decades if you clean it once a year for two minutes if it gets blocked. Also, if you are lazy and have hard water, it is entirely metal besides the washer. You can soak it in vinegar for a day or whatever.

Buy Water Saver Shower Head Now

This looks almost identical to a product I purchased from Wal-Mart (but it was under $6, so maybe you should buy it there). It may take a week or two to get used to it, but after that you won''t want anything else: high pressure, low water consumption. I always run mine at half-volume, so I''m using probably about 1.25gpm. If you really want to save water, you can easily switch it almost completely off while you aren''t rinsing, saving even more water. The instantly adjustable, variable pressure is just fantastic: once you have the temperature you want, you control the pressure separately.

Pros:

Energy efficient

Durable (take care of it and it will last for decades)

Cons:

No "massage" or "pulse" features, if you''re into that

Read Best Reviews of Water Saver Shower Head Here

This is the best shower head ever. We just remodeled our bathroom and I bought 2 different shower heads in dark brown and oil rubbed bronze. They were terrible. I am now painting the shower head to match our bathroom and I pray that it works.

W. Laubenheimer

Want Water Saver Shower Head Discount?

If the water pressure varies between your hot water line and cold water line, while you ''shut the water off'' at the shower head, one temperature of water will back up into the other line. So, if your cold water pressure is higher than your hot water pressure, when you turn the water back on at the shower head you''ll get a quick flash of ice cold water. Very awakening!!!! And of course the reverse is true, if your hot water is at a higher pressure than the cold water, you''ll get a quick flash of scalding hot water. Just be careful and check to see what will happen before you subject yourself to it. Some will tell you that your water pressure is always the same because it originates at the same intake pipe into your home, but for some reason, my hot water overpowers the cold and I get a short (perhaps six to ten seconds) flash of red hot water any time I turn the water off at the shower head. neadless to say, I never do that anymore! At my mom''s house, it''s the reverse, the cold water takes over. I can''t explain why, it just happens.

Austin Air Healthmate Jr Replacement Filter

Austin Air Healthmate Jr Replacement Filter w/ PrefilterThe item does what it''s supposed to do: It filters. It''s amazing how much quieter the machine gets when you replace the filter.

Doing the replacement itself is a bit of a dirty affair, because presumably the old filter is full of everything you''re allergic to, and you have to pull it right out of the machine, with dust going everywhere, before you put in the new one. I recommend doing it outside.

Canon EOS Rebel T4i 18.0 MP CMOS Digital SLR

Canon EOS Rebel T4i 18.0 MP CMOS Digital SLR with 18-55mm EF-S IS II Lens
  • 18.0 Megapixel CMOS (APS-C) sensor, 14-bit A/D conversion, ISO 100-12800; expandable to 25600 (H) for shooting from bright to dim light and high performance DIGIC 5 Image Processor for exceptional image quality and speed
  • High speed continuous shooting up to 5.0 fps allows you to capture all the action
  • Improved autofocus performance with a 9-point all cross-type AF system (including a high-precision dual-cross f/2.8 center point), and new Hybrid CMOS AF increases autofocus speed when shooting photos and movies in Live View
  • Enhanced EOS Full HD Movie mode with Movie Servo AF for continuous focus tracking of moving subjects, manual exposure control and multiple frame rates (1080: 30p (29.97) / 24p (23.976) / 25p, 720: 60p (59.94) / 50p, 480: 30p (29.97) / 25p)
  • New 3.0-inch Vari-angle Touch Screen Clear View LCD monitor II (approximately 1,040,000 dots) with smudge-resistant coating features multi-touch operation and Touch AF for an easy and intuitive experience, flexible positioning, and clear viewing even when outdoors

I had this long awesome review and Amazon lost it of course. So here goes a second try.

This is my second Canon camera. Previously I have owned Olympus and Minolta cameras. I owned a t2i before this and used a t3i for weeks for testing purposes. I will try to cover most aspects of the new features and image quality. For testing purposes I used a Canon 17-40L lens.

Look and Feel:

Not much to say here for the look of the camera. Looks almost the exact same as the t2i, t3i. The battery grip and accessories all fit the same. One thing that is different from the t2i is the proximity sensor. On the t2i it was below the optical viewfinder and above the screen. On the t4i it is above the optical viewfinder. I use an eyecup(http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B003Y06336)and it used to make the screen shut off on its own regularly on the t2i. This is a non issue for the t4i. There is also an added dedicated movie button in the power switch now.

Feel is a little different. The t4i feels more sturdy than the previous two rebels. The buttons are more solid and the selector wheels are improved. The adjustment wheel has better clicks and don''t feel like you could easily flick it and change a setting by accident. The mode selector wheel is sturdier as well. I notice this because my t2i used to regularly switch to A-DEP mode when I would pull the camera out of my bag and I would get upset if I missed a quick shot because of it. I feel this will be a non issue with the new model. One issue I have is using my eyecup mentioned previously. The flippy screen catches on this and is just a slight annoyance but not a huge deal in the grand scheme. The rebel series always felt a bit small in the hand for me so I now use a battery grip which adds weight and substance to the camera.

Touchscreen:

When I saw rumors that the t4i would have a touchscreen I first said I wouldn''t buy it. I figured this would be a gimmick and offer limited functionality. Then when i saw the press release and videos from Canon I changed my mind. I was sceptic of a couple things I will address here. I will start with the touch to adjust. Right now I feel kind of wonky using the touchscreen to make most adjustments to shooting in manual mode which is all i shoot in. But I consider this like moving from a blackberry to an iPhone. You are used to using buttons and the keyboard for so long you are lost on the touchscreen at first, but with time it ends up faster and easier. So in time it will end up faster for me to adjust by touch I am sure. It is in two spots already. ISO adjusting always seemed kind of odd to me on the rebel. The ISO button was placed so you had to kind of search for it and then do a three button combo to set it. On the touchscreen I find this easier. A couple taps and its done. The other major place it''s easier for me is AEB. Bracketing on Canon is typically a pain. Hit menu, find the exposure selector, hit OK. Slide the wheel, hit OK again then press menu. On touchscreen you just press the exposure and tap a couple times to set the bracket.

Touch to focus was something that I didn''t see coming from Canon. When they announced it my thought was it would be OK but nothing great. I figured it would be where you would touch on one of the 9 AF points you would like the camera to use. But thanks to the hybrid CMOS on the camera, it is truly a touch to focus. No matter where in the frame you press the camera will seek out and quickly focus on that area. This function works much better than I anticipated and I may use it in the future. At first I figured this would be a selling point for soccer moms but I was incorrect. I have not used the face detection follow focus to comment on it yet.

Image Quality:

This is the most important thing in the end when you buy any camera. How will my images look? The t4i does not disappoint. Thanks to improvements in the processor, focus, sensor and noise reduction software the t4i simply crushes the previous rebel cameras. We can start with the White balance. On the previous rebels and even the 60d, white balance was not so great. A yellow or tan-ish hue was almost always present and reds were soft. Canon has addressed this issue and images are clear and cary a nice contrast throughout the image. Auto focus I have touched on. Moving from 1 to 9 cross type AF points and a new added contrast detection sensor for AF makes a world of difference. Focus is fast and true and doesn''t waste time seeking as much as before. In live view mode in low light, the digic4 and old sensors were pretty bad. A lot of seeking and misplaced focal areas. This is greatly improved with this model. Because of these reasons if you shoot in auto focus or any auto mode on the camera your images will turn out better.

Low Light/High ISO:

When the digic 5 was announced Canon touted this as being able to provide up to 75% better image quality over the digic 4. Of course I didn''t buy into this because it''s Canon and they were there to sell you. With the t4i Canon added the digic 5 as well as some new noise reduction software to boot. How did it make out? I tested these things against a Canon 60D. Same lens, same settings. In RAW at ISO 6400 the image quality looked at least twice as good over the 60D in terms of noise. At 12800 its laughable. That being said, on my t2i I would not use an image over ISO 1600 to print or display or sell. On the t4i I would gladly use ISO 3200 and at times 6400. Auto focus is so much improved at high ISO and low light that it''s one of the first things you notice when comparing the camera to the 60D.

Battery life: Have not used it a full day to test yet. I imagine if you use full time AF it will go down slightly from the previous models.

Other Additions:

Scene Intelligent Auto....Used for one shot. Seemed to be OK but I am a manual shooter. I am sure this would work well for most beginners.

Handheld Night Scene....This takes 4 quick shots in a row and then in the camera combines them to reduce shake and noise. At 6400 ISO the image did result in less noise over standard shooting in RAW. This mode can only be done in JPG. I can see it being very good indoors at functions or for quick night shots outside.

HDR Backlight Control....This will do in camera HDR. It takes three shots of various exposure and combines them to improve highlight and shadow detail.This worked well and didn''t produce too much noise in low light. It does not produce an image that people now days think of in HDR with blown out tones and surreal feeling to it. It is more traditional in where it just makes shadows appear less and corrects some blowing out by brighter lights in a frame. Works well for what its supposed to be. Also only available in JPG

Autofocus during video...Worked well and somewhat fast with my 17-40. Still allowed some noise from the lens searching for focus, but I wasn''t using one of the STM lenses designed for this function.

EDIT: Since my initial review I have had a chance to test video with an STM lens and try out the face follow focus. The STM lens does improve focus speed quite a bit in video and is much quieter. There is still a little noise but may be something you don''t notice depending on the scene you are shooting. Face follow focus works better than I thought it would. It can actually focus on an object as well as just faces. It follows through the frame very well and precise even in low light. It''s nto super fast to focus but still works well.

PROS:

Outstanding Image Quality. Even at higher ISO

Touchscreen

Ease Of Use

5 Frames Per Second Shooting

Auto Focus

CONS:

Built in stereo mic is kind of pointless unless you use an STM lens. Maybe even then.

The bezel around the touchscreen is uneven, but that has nothing to do with function. It''s just poor design.

Learning curve on the touchscreen

Feature guide...It makes touchscreen control unbearable. Just disable it as soon as you turn the camera on and save yourself the frustration of being told why you need to change ISO every time you touch the button for it.

FINAL WORD:

If you were holding back or looking for a reason to upgrade your digic 4 based camera this is the one you are looking for. Compared to the t2i/t3i/60D this camera will offer you better image quality, focus, low light performance and ease of use. Yes the 60D is an "upgrade" over the rebel line but as of now, you''d only gain size, weight and one stop of shutter speed over the t4i with the 60D. With the t4i you''d gain better images, video, high ISO performance, touchscreen, shutter lag and a few other things. This camera offers many new technologies and additions from Canon that aren''t seen on any other camera in their line up. If you are a beginner or someone with a previous rebel looking for a nice camera you will find this camera to offer many things that you will enjoy in a first camera or an upgrade. This camera can make your photos better by taking the same photos as you would have with the previous models just with the improvements and that is what you should look for. The t3i was a small upgrade form the t2i and Canon has made up for it with this rebel.

If you do own or buy this camera join the flickr group we have made. It can be found at Flickr /groups/canont4i/

Buy Canon EOS Rebel T4i 18.0 MP CMOS Digital SLR Now

I''ve only had my T3i for about 8 months when this came out but I read the details and decided to pre-order. The new T4i just arrived today (body only) and I''ve been playing around with it all afternoon using my 50mm 1.4 lens.

All I can say so far is WOW I''m very impressed with the upgraded autofocus, the touchscreen, as well as the new focus selection methods. There is a LOT less delay when you move the camera and what you see on the screen in Live Mode. Live Mode is MUCH "snappier" feeling. When you turned on the T3i in Live Mode, it would have a little rectangle you could move around the screen to make sure the camera was focusing on what you wanted. But with the T4i, this system is much more versatile. You can tap the screen to instantly set a focus point, or you can move the little box around (which is much smaller and more precise now and it will also FOLLOW your focus point when you move the camera around!), or you can allow for a more "general focus" by getting rid of the little box and letting the camera choose how it wants to focus, similar to how it works when using only the viewfinder to take photos. When you do the "general focus", a bunch of little boxes appear on the screen letting you know exactly which parts of the photo are in sharp focus the T3i did not do this and only relied on the positioning of the focus box.

The continuous autofocus during video worked very well on my 50mm 1.4 lens sure, the focus motor was a little noisy, but if you''re taking scenic shots or something where you''ll be replacing the audio with music anyway, motor noise is a non-issue. If you''re doing interviews where the person is talking into a lav mic, it still won''t be an issue because the lav mic will be too far away to pick up the motor noise. Motor noise is only an issue if you''re using the built in mic, which I would regard as an "emergency only" mic anyway.

So all this means that you do NOT need an STM lens to use continuous autofocus the main purpose of the STM technology as I understand it is to make autofocus FASTER and QUIET. Video autofocus with my 50mm 1.4 is what I would call "fast enough" meaning, it is a bit slow compared to a camcorder (and noticeable on-screen), but not so slow that it should distract my viewers from the content too much. The only time continuous autofocus won''t serve you very well is in dark rooms where it can''t lock on to anything very quickly. My 50mm 1.4 lens hunted for focus in very dark areas so in situations like that I would manual focus.

Video is excellent quality as always. If you''re used to the T3i video, this is just as stellar and tends to make people and scenes look better than they do in real life (when using the 50mm 1.4 at least) They''ve moved the video mode to be part of the on/off switch instead of on the mode dial which is where it was on the T3i. This allows you to pick a mode on the dial and then turn on video straight from there and make use of those settings. So you can do full auto exposure video, full manual exposure video, or Program Mode video very easily.

I also love the increased ISO to 12800 and the ability for the camera to take multiple exposures and combine them to help eliminate noise and camera shake. This works very well for my purposes. It''s a small thing but something I''ve not noticed anyone else talking about is how much BETTER the shutter sounds. Somehow it''s more satisfying and reminds me of the more expensive cameras.

HDR Mode: I''ve uploaded some of this camera''s HDR photos to the image section on this page so you can see how well it did combining 3 photos at 3 different exposures the T4i can do this in camera with no software needed. It takes 3 quick photos and processes them for a few seconds and then the result is the image you see. The 3 originals do not get saved. To save them, you would have to use manual exposure bracketing which this camera does quite well. When using HDR mode, you only have to worry about getting proper focus and then everything else is taken care of for you. Some of the images can come out looking a little weird, but if you take 2 or 3 different versions at different focal points, you should get at least one that looks very nice and detailed with lighting that doesn''t look too cartoony. One thing that surprised me was how, in one of my photos, a car unexpectedly entered the scene while it was taking the 3 shots. The resulting image had NO car at all. Pretty cool.

CONS: So far, the only thing I DON''T like about the cam are the buttons somehow they feel cheaper and more fragile than on the T3i. I''ll update this if I discover anything else not up to par.

Overall, I love the camera and am very happy with my upgrade over the T3i. I''m really looking forward to seeing what the new STM lenses can do.

Read Best Reviews of Canon EOS Rebel T4i 18.0 MP CMOS Digital SLR Here

I upgraded from Canon T1i to Canon T4i. Having this T4i camera for 3 days and taking more than 1,000 pictures in different modes and environments, I want to write a few words for other fellows.

The main reasons for my upgrade are: 1) 9 cross-type focusing points; 2) Faster shooting burst rate; 3) Continuous video focusing; 4) Touch screen (very useful features). The picture quality is from very good to excellent. Color tone is realistic. Pictures from T4i camera look better than pictures from T1i camera in term of white balance and sharpness (probably from the benefits of 9 cross-type focus points). It is definitely more snappy in sport mode, focusing is fast and burst rate is good. I do like the continuous focusing feature in the video mode because of the convenience. It takes between 1 2 second to focus to new scene and you can hear the focusing noise from the lense. Definitely, there are rooms for improvement (faster focusing and reduce the motor noise during focusing) in video feature. I don''t have the new Canon STM lense, so I don''t know if it is quite or not.

This camera is good enough as an entry level and for people who to upgrade from their point-and-shoot cameras.

Link to some sample pictures that I took with my Canon T4i camera (go to flickr.com and search under tags only for henrynnguyen). I uploaded the orginal picture size (3456x5184 pixels), but the flickr.com reduced the picture size to 1365x2048 pixels. Hopefully that you still have a sense of how the picture quality look. Most of my pictures were taken in raw format, then converted to jpeg format using Canon provided software. The lenses that I used were Canon 50mm F1.4 USM and Canon 28-70mm F2.8 L series. The memory card is ScanDisk 32GB, UHS-1 rated. The Canon T4i camera performs as advertised by Canon. My main interests are accurate and fast focusing with high burst rate (who is not???). Overall, this is a very good entry dSLR camera. So, I am happy with the product and intend to keep it.

Want Canon EOS Rebel T4i 18.0 MP CMOS Digital SLR Discount?

I have the T3i and absolutely love the camera. Its feature packed and has incredible image quality. I recently purchased the T4i (body only) and was thoroughly impressed with the first press of the shutter!

Cross Type Focal Points:

Not only is the shutter quieter and faster than the T3i''s, the enhanced cross type focusing on all points combined with the new image sensor is WAY FASTER and MORE ACCURATE than the already good but not great T3i. I rarely use the outer focal points on the T3i because the focusing is slow and unreliable, its always been center point or manual focus for me. Not so on the T4i! Super fast focusing on all points and great image quality!

Touch Screen:

Excellent addition to any DSLR and it works wonderfully! Everything you can do from the Main Menu button on the T3i and the Quick Menu button can be done through the Touchscreen''s interface on the T4i. EVERYTHING!

Constant Auto Focus:

I tested this feature with my existing lenses and yes, you do notice the hunting and hear the autofocus motor (which will vary from lens to lens) but I have not tested it with the new 4omm or the new 18-135 STM lenses, yet.

Custom White Balance:

I believe this is new or I just never used it on my T3i. A very nice grid displays from the Quick Menu that allows you to set a custom white balance. No, this is not just selecting AWB from the white balance options, thats still available but the custom piece appears to be a new feature. (I could very well be wrong about that one)

The ADEP option has been removed from the dial. I rarely used it but it was nice having the foreground and background in focus option available in the ''manual'' region of the dial.

UPDATED/CORRECTED INFO:

Earlier I made a correction regarding the lack of digital zoom. Well, the final correction to my previous correction is this, there is in fact no digital zoom. At least none I can find that is recordable while in video mode. You are still able to zoom in and essentially magnify a selected area but when you begin your recording the cropped or zoomed area goes away and your standard focal length will be recorded.

The viewfinder has a slight amber color as opposed to the bluish hue on the T3i. I can''t say I see if this is a benefit or not but its worthy of mentioning for those doing research.

A friend asked me how much I think the T4i is better than the T3i. The only answer I had was this, "I was considering getting a 60D to take advantage of the faster shutter and better focusing (9 point cross type). Seeing how well those improvements on the T4i work, I forgot all about the 60D!" I know the 60D is better built and has a better/larger viewfinder but for my money, the T4i fit the bill!

These are things I''ve found to be improvements and overall nice features about the T4i but you should do as much research as possible. DPreview . com is an excellent site for camera gear information but the last time I checked they did not have a hands on review, only some canned information from Canon. Another great, I MEAN GREAT site is The-Digital-Picture . com. Again, too new for a review to be there but I encourage you to go there, absorb and be a well informed consumer and a better photographer!

Now I wonder if that 70D rumor is true.....

You''re thinking of getting the t4i, reading the reviews, comparing it to the t3i and countless others and pulling your hair out at all the pros and cons? Am I close? I''m a photographer and have used this, the t3i and its sony equivalent. I might be able to help. Here''s hoping :) Let me start with an anecdote, (you''ve read enough technical jargon for now so consider this a breather)

I film eagles on the isle of Mull in the Scottish hebrides and the landlady I stay with was telling me about this other photographer who visits her little cottage (it''s beautiful by the way, you should visit if you get the chance). So anyway, she is cooking tea , as she does if you ask her nicely. While it''s cooking he shows her one of his photos, probably of a sea eagle catching a fish. Everyone wants to photograph one of those even though its on every other postcard in Scotland. Next to a highland cow looking over a gate its the top photo/cliche to get.. Anyhoo, she looks at the photo and says "wow that''s great...you must have a brilliant camera" .

So they sit down for supper a bit later and its delicious, she is a great cook. He says "This is lovely...you must have some great saucepans!" boom boom.

But herein lies the real point of this camera. You know its the person behind the camera that takes the pictures but do you really know it? This and the t3i take pictures so good (if you have the skill) you could blow it up the size of front door but are you going to want to. The thing no sellers want to tell you is that for years, maybe 5 , all of the big names have been making great dslr. Since the nikon d40 perhaps. But you really want to know, if you bought this, would you be happy or buying a pup. Be reassured that neither canon, nikon or sony make chocolate teapots. They know how to make a great camera and this is one. It''s biggest difference as you will have read ad nauseum , is the touch screen. is it worth it. It is if you like touch screens (I do). That''s not flippant, it''s how it is.

So the photos will be great and its a great camera, you''ve read other reviews so I won''t duplicate what you have already read but one thing you may not have read is about the video. All the makers have got dslr right. No pups in sight, but video is a relatively new feature and Sony have tbh been leading the way. This camera sets to rectify that by having autofocus. A lot of places on the net, say it''s not needed, you should be using manual focus. Nonsense. Manual focus is ok at times but can be a pain. Filming your dog on the beach for example..The autofocus on the t4i is actually pretty good. Not as good as a camcorder but pretty good. The slowest part is for it to get going. But when it''s locked on its sound. Well worth having. So thats sorted right..err no, not really. This is the 650d ''s killer feature. Trouble is, they left out the killer feature on the 600d. The 3x zoom with "no loss in quality". So here is the choice if you are buying this for video.

if you want you''re 300mm zoom to be able to zoom to 900mm for filming sport or wildlife. It''s the t3i for you.

If you love the idea of autofocus (or hate the idea of doing it the old fashioned way) its the t4i for you.

In my opinion if you''re considering the other makes like Sony, it comes down to who makes the the lens you are likely to want. I know I have focused (blabbed on) about video but hey, there has been thousands of photo reviews already about iso , shutter speed etc etc. Nothing for me to add there!

So if you are considering using it for video here are a few "must have" things you will need to go with it.

Velbon DV7000 3-Section Ultra Heavy Duty Tripod with Geared Center Column, 2-Way Fluid Head and QB-6RL Quick Shoe, Max Height 64-inch, Supports 9.9 lbs

58mm HMC Ultraviolet UV(C) Haze Multicoated Filter Doesn''t have to be this particular one but hey..

Oh and the one that should have gone top of my list

Make better videos with your dslr or camcorder (gives details of the counter intuitive settings that actually work best :) )

So now I have spent ten minutes typing away, telling you how I like the t4i for video (I do) do me a little favour and click that you find this helpful. Unless you don''t. Either way you will enjoy this camera but do consider the little brother the t3i also. We live in good times to take photos as there are so many great cameras and this is definitely one of them. One more thing I forgot to mention (and yes it is regarding the video) is that to get great video you need to use the right settings in the menu. Unfortunately these are counter intuitive and if you don''t use them you may be under whelmed. If anyone wants them, comment and I will try to post a link

Shop-vac 901-07-19 Reusable Dry Filter Save 2% Off

Shop-vac 901-07-19 Reusable Dry FilterThese filter cloths fit my small shop vac great. They were much less expensive here on Amazon than at my local hardware store. Only my local True Value carried these filters, which seem to be somewhat hard to find.

Filters are a must for the Mini Shop Vac. They last a long time & can be rinsed out and reused again. Easy to install.

Buy Shop-vac 901-07-19 Reusable Dry Filter Now

This is exactly what I was looking for when I bought it. I''m very satisfied with the purchase and I look forward to their long wear.

Read Best Reviews of Shop-vac 901-07-19 Reusable Dry Filter Here

Having purchased a ShopVac at a flea market sans filters, I needed to go shopping around to prevent it spitting dust everywhere during use.

The ShopVac site told me my little 1x1 needed 901-07-00 filters, but their own price for them wasn''t great and the filters here (901-07-19) were all Amazon had. So I took a chance.

I''m happy to report the filters are fully compatible with 901-07-00-needing ShopVacs. Not sure why the need to give you 3 of them if they''re "reusable," but at least that''s liable to be a lifetime supply for ~$5.

Want Shop-vac 901-07-19 Reusable Dry Filter Discount?

As advertised, this works with shopvac 12RT300. You have to also get the foam sleeve. I got three filters plus the ring, as advertised. Good buy at $5.

Save 2% Off